Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal Vol. 5(3-4), 2014 pp. 1-19 Published online: 02 Oct 2014
In February 2014, a group of forensic experts was convened to discuss current topics in the profession. The topics ranged from progress since the National Research Council report in 2009, to education and training, certification, research, and other professional issues, including ethics. This transcript, which represents the dynamic interaction of the participants, has been edited for clarity and length.
View the fulltext (QH staff only)
ForensicCONNECT 29 September 2014
Low copy number (LCN) typing is a general technique used for analyzing low-quantity DNA samples. Short tandem repeat (STR) testing on aged and extremely limited samples, such as “touch DNA” samples, has increased over the past decade. Samples with low quantities of template DNA are typically subjected to exaggerated stochastic effects during the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that impact the reproducibility and reliability of DNA typing results.
Download PhD Thesis by Pamela L Marshall (226 pp)
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2014 James Robertson pp. 365-367
The Canberra Times reports that Dr Bob Moles, Coordinator, Networked Knowledge, has told them that ‘A Royal Commission should be held into the forensic procedures that have been operating in Australia for the past 20 years in light of the inquiry findings into the murder conviction of David Harold Eastman’.
Dr Moles likened errors in the Eastman case to the Splatt and Chamberlain cases from the 1980s and is quoted as saying ‘Forensic evidence experts told the royal commission that every piece of evidence was flawed.’ It is not entirely clear if Dr Moles was referring in this statement to the Splatt and/or the Chamberlain case. As I was one of the ‘forensic evidence experts’ who assisted the Royal Commission into the conviction of Splatt, his statement is unhelpful and a gross oversimplification.
Notwithstanding, and regrettably, the Report to the Board of Inquiry into the conviction of David Harold Eastman for the murder of Colin Stanley Winchester does not make pleasant reading from a forensic viewpoint.
Posted in Clinical forensic medicine, Drug analysis and toxicology, Forensic DNA, Forensic pathology, Leadership / Management, Physical evidence, zJournal articles
Tagged Australia, Forensic science;, Forensic testing, Gunshot residues, Police investigations
Journal of Forensic Sciences , Issue 5, pages 1343–1350, September 2014
Forensic practitioners and crime laboratories regularly collect and analyze fingernail evidence; however, the best techniques for processing such evidence have not been established. In this study, numerous aspects of fingernail evidence processing—collection of exogenous cells, transportation, purification of DNA, and STR analysis—were analyzed using fingernails harboring applied blood or epithelial cells from scratchings. Autosomal STR mixtures resulted when fingernails were soaked or swabbed, while scrapings rarely generated mixtures but exhibited allelic dropout. Y-STRs yielded single source profiles, with scrapings again showing dropout. A silica-based kit extraction recovered significantly more exogenous DNA than did organic extraction, neither of which was affected by nail polish. Swabbing nails in succession resulted in some cross-contamination from exogenous material, while transporting nails together did not, although there was loss of exogenous cells. Optimized nail processing produced complete Y-STR profiles of male volunteers from female fingernails following scratchings.
View the fulltext (QH staff only)